You are here

Using DNA to Test the Utility of Pellet-Group Counts as an Index of Deer Counts

TitleUsing DNA to Test the Utility of Pellet-Group Counts as an Index of Deer Counts
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsBrinkman, TJ, Person, DK, Smith, W, Chapin III, SF, McCoy, K, Leonawicz, M, Hundertmark, KJ
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume37
Pagination444–450
Abstract

Despite widespread use of fecal pellet-group counts as an index of ungulate density, techniquesused to convert pellet-group numbers to ungulate numbers rarely are based on counts of known individuals,seldom evaluated across spatial and temporal scales, and precision is infrequently quantified. Using DNAfrom fecal pellets to identify individual deer, we evaluated the relationship between pellet-group count andcount of Sitka black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus sitkensis) during a 3-year study (2006–2008) in 3watersheds in southeast Alaska, USA. We surveyed 141,054 m2 of transect, counted 10,569 pellet groups,and identified 737 unique deer. We used a multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear model to analyzeexpected deer count as a function of pellet-group count. Pellet-group count was a significant predictor ofDNA-based index of deer count, but that relationship varied by transect, watershed, and year, indicating thatextrapolation of a single linear relationship across space and time was not possible. More importantly, most ofthe variation in ourmodels was residual and unexplained. Assuming that our DNA-based results were amoreaccurate and precise metric of true deer count, we do not support the use of pellet-group count to index deercount in southeast Alaska unless confounding factors are accounted for at fine spatial (e.g., habitat patch)scales. Because of the difficulty in routinely evaluating the influence of confounding variables in remote andunmanaged landscapes, we suggest that wildlife programs in these environments consider alternatives, such asDNA-based methods, for monitoring trends in ungulate populations. ! 2013 The Wildlife Society.

DOI10.1002/wsb.270
Username Tag: